The Occupy Wall Street Movement and Ensuing Controversy

Hundreds of people gathered in Zuccotti Park in New York on September 17, 2011 This is the "Occupy Wall Street" banner in the financial district of Wall Street: In addition, these three words happened to reflect the current state of the US financial situation I am protesting. As the US economy gets so bad and the unemployment rate soared, there is absolutely a need for some kind of change. The protest action "to occupy Wall Street" is the most positive movement for the US economy and is one step in the right direction.

Let's look at the case of Occupy Wall Street, mistakes in social movements, and comparison with Brazilian protests. Occupy Wall Street proposes several key ideals that the PAC can use to purchase parliamentary voting, government relief, and tax evasion / vulnerability to financial elite. First of all, these ideals are sufficient to cause protests, but it is much larger than the Brazilian passage protests. However, many people point out that OWS has failed. These ideas drifted, the problem areas and teams diversified too much, and the goal was blurred. In Brazil, federal traffic has wise maintenance goals. The idea of ​​talking equally throughout the organization further promoted OWS, as OWS has just gone too far from movement without a leader. As an equal voice group, they divide movement

The nature of Occupy Wall Street is quite different. The message is a call for equality. Activists are satisfied that they dominate the company, politics, economy by 1%. The rise of sports already completed the plan. The event page was created by social media and was held at Zuccotti Park on September 17, 2011, the campaign and its online show began. Like the tea party exercise, "Occupy Wall Street" is recognized by news stations, newspapers and magazines, and growing due to popularity. Slowly, "Occupy Wall Street" began to gather less and less attention until the event was finally demolished. As opposed to the tea party movements, "Occupy Wall Street" suddenly began and ended organically. The traces and intentions of these two movements are still on today's social media and sports-specific websites but are not active in a way that has returned in 2010 and 2011.

After the creation and dissemination of the social media platform, this change was revealed in early social media campaigns. Some good examples include the occupation of Wall Street (OWS) in 2011 and the Global Justice Movement (GJM), both of which are fighting economic inequality. These two moves were led by young members, their popularity on social media grew and they soon became internationally recognized. When OWS participants were investigated later, approximately 77% said they posted action online, beyond the proportion of those who said they personally are talking about trends with someone. At the same time, with the live broadcast on social media and the release of a short "People's Microphone" song, the progress of this movement widespread. Face-to-face discussions, online discussions, and this growing transition from the conference show the power of social media.