The Nuremberg Code

In the experiment it is necessary to destroy the twins to make a necropsy to confirm the actual death and the other uninfected twins must be killed, so the twinning experience "Nuremberg code" of the German Nazi behavior test There is no need to discuss. If there is another way to perform these experiments, the research should use the person who lost the plan or body to perform these experiments, or use mutual killing to obtain the results of these experiments otherwise Can be avoided.

1947: Nuremberg Code: In a case in Nuremberg, judges summarized basic ethical principles for conducting research. Under Nuremberg law, there are ten conditions to be met before ethical research. Nuremberg law became the first international standard for research and introduced the era of modern protection for human research participants. 1948: The United Nations adopted the "Universal Declaration of Human Rights". The Universal Declaration of Human Rights declares that everyone has the right to certain rights and freedoms. "Declaration" is inspired by the atrocities committed during World War II and strongly believes in the need to protect human rights at the international level.

Skin acre begins with Nuremberg code and its ten ethical and legal requirements for permitted human experiments. In Nuremberg, the German Nuremberg program was enacted in August 1947 by the ruling parties, in rulings of 23 doctors and scientists in the United States by the judges in the United States, they conducted medical experiments in the concentration camps and conducted murder and torture ( Doctor 's judgment) and accuse you of accusation. "Code" is correctly defined as a set of rules to protect the most authoritative subjects in the study, the first rule is that you must obtain the subject's consent in the case of no form of compulsion .

Informed consent is the core of the Nuremberg Code of Conduct and is properly considered to protect the subject human rights. The main contribution of Nuremberg is to compile Hippocrates' morality and human rights protection into one norm. In Nuremberg law, physicians - researchers not only require that the best interests of subjects be protected (Principle 2 - 8 and 10), we also require that subjects actively protect themselves (in principle 1 and 9 ). Most notably, in Hippocratic Ethics, for example, subjects rely on the physician to decide when he or she will end his / her participation in the subject. In Nuremberg law, judges give the subjects the right to terminate as much as the doctor's researcher before completing the experiment (principle 9).