Essay sample library > The Numerberg Trials: A Victors Justice

The Numerberg Trials: A Victors Justice

2024-01-10 00:19:59

After the Second World War, Numerberg 's trial was unfair. The victorious ally decided to try the defeated Nazis. These trials continued from November 20, 1945 through October 1, 1946. The winners argued that they would give the defendant a fair trial, but after careful consideration, we actually find that these trials are biased and "justice of victory". After the war, the Allied leaders had their own ideas on how to respond to the Nazis. Stalin suggested that they should receive a trial, but everyone here was guilty and was shot afterwards.

Some people think that the Nuremberg trial is "justice of the winner", and the trial is criticized for various reasons. The accused was accused of violating international law, but the law was binding on the state, not individuals. Individuals can only prosecute under their own domestic laws. Many critics believe the winner's international justice is wrong. Prior to the dismissal of Churchill, he met with President Roosevelt and the Soviet leader Joseph Stalin at the Yalta Conference to plan a war to conquer the future of the land. Most of the problems ended with the differences between the two parties, but one of the decisions was to establish the United Nations. This is a peacekeeping organization consisting of countries all over the world.

During the trial, Americans put American justice on international justice. This is meaningless as these tests contain many countries, but the United States uses justice standards. The trial should be an international overview, so you should not follow the national justice. The United States should use "American justice" to make a trial, but they have not followed even their own constitution. The Constitution of the United States stipulates that the law can not be formulated "afterwards", but during the trial Nuremberg enacted several laws, such as starting crimes against humanity and invasive wars. These laws were enacted after the Germans promised. It is unfair to condemn the Germans for the offenses they were violated before breaking the law.