The NSA, Privacy and the War or Terrorism

Edward Snowden is a controversial person in the United States recently. People can not decide whether he is their hero or a traitor. However, he explained the disclosure requirements of the US Government Supervisory Program PRISM. Many American citizens are angry about the government's idea of ​​tracking telecommunications systems. According to factbrowser.com, 54% of Internet users desire more online privacy even if there is a risk of fraud (the fact tagged with privacy). They say that this is an infringement of the constitutional right to privacy.

Since the disclosure of the global monitoring of 2013, initiated by former National Security Agency employee Edward Snowden, human rights forces majestic privacy has been the subject of international debate. To fight global terrorism, government agencies such as the National Security Agency, Central Intelligence Agency, R & AW, GCHQ and others are involved in large-scale worldwide surveillance. There is now a question of whether the right of privacy can coexist with the current ability of an information agency to access and analyze every detail of an individual's life. The main question is whether it is necessary to confiscate the right of privacy as part of social contract to strengthen the defense against so-called terror threats.

Since the disclosure of worldwide surveillance, initiated by Edward Snowden, the contractor of the former National Security Agency (NSA) in 2013, force majeure privacy has been the subject of international debate. In the fight against global terrorism, government agencies such as the National Security Agency, Central Intelligence Agency, R & AW, and GCHQ are involved in large-scale worldwide surveillance. "Now Google and AT & T can track us more in detail than any other N.A. The Madison Constitution may not be enough to protect our privacy and dignity in the 21st century."

The National Security Agency refused to confirm or deny the relationship with Google, but privacy and civil rights officials were worried. In 2011, the Electronic Privacy Information Center submitted a law request for freedom of information about 2010 Google China user network attacks recorded by the National Security Agency. The request was rejected and the National Security Agency stated that this disclosure of information would endanger the US government's information system. The Google Chrome browser itself is a nightmare of privacy. You can link all the activities in the browser to your Google Account. If you control your browser, search engine, and you have tracking scripts on the website you visit, they have the ability to track you from multiple angles