The News About The News, American Journalism in Peril

Why is not it even optimistic or desperate? Of course there are. In the era of creative destruction, destruction is more visible than creativity, but some new online news providers are doing interesting work to compensate for the shrinking of traditional stores. In Connecticut, for example, some bloggers are currently reporting state members, CT Mirror, a nonprofit news site, has a full-time Washington correspondent. Dozens of news sites have appeared throughout the country and provided some local reports. Many of them hire their own reporters, some of them are very good.

Sometimes there are also some web-based operations that destroy important country stories. The best one is ProPublica, a non-profit organization established by former editor-in-chief editor Paul Steiger of the Wall Street Journal and is dedicated to investigating the press. ProPublica offers top quality quality public service news as well as major newspaper survey items. It has almost 12 million dollars annually from donors exclusively and funds 45 journalists and editors. But as the reporter acknowledges, the most influential story of ProPublica is in collaboration with traditional news organizations that publish or broadcast them. Its own excellent website has a relatively small audience

Other non-profit organizations also provide reports provided only by major news organizations in the past. The winner of the Pulitzer Prize in 2014 is Chris Hamby of the Public Integrity Center in Washington. This group manages many electronic documents and tracks the flow of funds to politics. Former senior editor of The Wall Street Journal and Washington Post Marcus Brahli recently acknowledged that the number of US journalism was not so high due to Internet service.

In the past newspapers such as Times and post newspapers generally provided readers with the best coverage of a wide range of news categories. Sports ESPN, Washington Politico, Popculture BuzzFeed and so on, everyone has competitors today. Our post once occupied a part of the Washington market - competitors can not challenge any of our major categories. There is no corner now

I would like to emphasize that the emotional concept of news is not new. The US press invented the concept of "yellow news". I am trying to bring excitement about sensational news, your fears, surprises, and what is going on in the world. Making the crisis drama was always part of the mass media. The news theater is as old as broadcast news. News as a sight is always one of its dramatic forms. If the news does not draw your attention, you will not notice it if you do not know it is funny, funny, horrible or exciting it

Unfortunately, according to Pew News and Media Research Center, it is not a newspaper that most Americans receive election news. Most Americans believe that cable news is the most useful source for presidential elections and that social media and local TV news will follow. Unfortunately, some of the best print / digital reports have been lost due to cable TV noise and ubiquity. Cable television is good at the latest news, but between these events there is speculation about thinking and ordinary jabber (Exception: Jake Tapper, he made a difficult question; Steve Schmidt, he has a powerful analysis Provided). Cable TV news reports about elections like sports - people who are having the best days, the best people, those who fail

The topic after the US presidential election in 2016 is the spread of counterfeiting or misleading news as news coverage. These stories are simply invalid information at the most, and the worst is a blatant lie. There is good reason to believe that misleading counterfeit news will affect the outcome of the election. However, please note that the truth boundary between lies and online information is often ambiguous. Although essentially unrealistic, there are many sources of publications that create biased reality by choosing how to express publications and narratives. Portrait photographer Enzo dal Verme presented calm testimony, even though the mainstream media was forced to change or obscure the truth, fearing advertiser response. As long as people think that they have the right to get news for free, the necessary media will have to depend on the advertiser to earn income.