The Net Neutrality Verdict Is In: We Won!

Today, the judge ruled in favor of the Federal Communications Commission's network neutral rules - agree to the majority of Internet users who can protect the connection and communication rights of everyone and must protect To

This result proves the fact that we always know. The Federal Communications Commission has chosen the correct legal path to protect our Internet freedom.

This decision is a great victory for millions of Internet users who have been suffering from network neutrality for years. They are working hard to confirm that the FCC has the authority to protect everyone's online connection and communication. The court maintains clear agency authority to prevent Internet service providers from improperly interfering with our communications. It confirms that this authority is based on the basic communication law and recognizes the important role of open Internet in our society.

It has already been said that the court has already said that this should be the last sentence of net neutrality. Companies and Congress should comply with the law, listen to people's wishes and leave the Federal Communications Commission to work. However, if opponents of the open Internet try to submit their case to Congress or the Supreme Court, we will continue to work with millions of Americans who are committed to protecting the Internet.

We need the FCC to enforce that rule. We will focus on the misuse of ISPs, identify any new network neutrality violations, if any, and officially file complaints with the agencies on irrational plans for broadband providers.

Just because we have won the right does not mean the opponent will quit. Whether the fight is in Congress or the Supreme Court, we will protect the Internet that was held there ... I will win with your help.

At the moment, California does not have its own network neutrality rule. We postponed the federal requirements. My law brings a net neutral requirement to California. There are various ways to bring neutrality to California. California regulates business practices, demands network neutrality, conditional state contracts subject to network neutrality, and as a condition to use the Internet transport infrastructure and public transport rights of broadband packages as a condition of a cable franchise agreement As part of the network neutrality is required.

In the past three years, we saw threats from net neutral victories being threatened. Activists in developed countries are working to promote the importance of online neutrality for free expression, innovation, and competition, and in some cases increasingly for regulatory audiences. Many of the developing countries are facing critics who believe that non-neutral Internet access can be used as "entrance" to open the Internet to a certain degree of freedom (even if supporting new evidence supports new research)

Under the trump regime, the neutrality of the network is threatened again, the current Internet service provider and the US Federal Communications Commission chairman Ahit, network neutral legal representative oversees free-market competition troublesome He insisted. Consumers who contend for neutrality of the net, for the neutrality of the net, as if they fighting against their core principles, this is especially true for other people who care about liberal and big government I will not admit it. As we know today, the broadband industry was born through the 1984 Wired Communication Policy Act (also known as the 1984 cable law). This bill was passed to clarify the relationship between local governments and cable providers with the aim of gradually improving cable extension throughout the continental United States.