The National Security Agency and The Surveillance Scandal

INTRODUCTION In recent years, the National Security Agency (NSA) has been widely censored for its disclosure in the national surveillance program. And it eventually violated the privacy rights of thousands of innocent Americans. Until recently this exposure has become the forefront of the media headline and the National Security Agency's privacy violation goes back to the beginning of the 21st century when the national spy activity program called "presidential supervision program" was carried out by President George.

Investigator Glenn Greenwald condemned the National Security Agency scandal, which triggered a debate on national security and information privacy. Along with further revelation from Edward Snowden's document entrusted to Glenn Greenwald, this book explores extraordinary cooperation between the private sector and the National Security Agency, as well as the widespread impact of government monitoring programs. There are unprecedented opportunities at home and abroad. Behind the scenes, since confidential documents he distributed were proved to be large, follow the award winning director Laura Portras and journalist Glenn Greenwald in Hong Kong hotel room in amazing contact with reporter Edward Snowden Evidence that distinguishes privacy and infringes illegally. NSA

During the Obama administration, we learned that the National Security Agency (NSA) is conducting extensive monitoring of our telephone conversations and electronic communications. President Trump, his prosecutor general Jeff Sessions and the Republican leadership in Congress are currently planning to pass a bill to promote massive monitoring by the National Security Agency. Senator Richard Burr (R-NC) introduced by Devin Nunes (R-CA) and the FISA 2017 Revised Reauthorization Act (S 2010 and HR 4478) introduced why the federal government can monitor the United States I will provide it without. Citizenship practice or search warrant required by Article 4 amendment of the US Constitution

Five months before this year, the telecommunications company broke the federal government's oversight of US and foreign phone and electronic communications, based on confidential documents leaked by Edward Snowden, a contractor of the National Security Agency. The first story and subsequent reports caused a global debate on surveillance practices, data privacy and leaks. After the disclosure of Snowden, Americans opposed the influence of leakage immediately, but most said the government should resort to leaks. According to a survey conducted by the Pew Research Center a few days after the revelation, about half of Americans (49%) stated that the disclosure of confidential information is for public interest and 44% said they hurt public interests It was. Adults under the age of 30 may say that leaks are in the public interest (60%) than elderly Americans, but there is no difference in party opinion between these views.