The Moral Judgment Relationship Between Leaders and Followers: A Comparative Study Across the Taiwan Strait

Statistical significance (Total, t = 94, p <0.01; Taiwan, t = 19, p <0.01; China, t = 66, p <0.01)

p \ 0.01 for Taiwan, Z = 71, p \ 0.05; for China, Z = 02, p <0.05). As the leaders prefer leadership, set goals, take risks and explore new challenges (Rest 1986)

The tracking expert (r = 0.18; t = 25, p <0.01) is higher than the relevance of the procurement experts in Taiwan

Passion (r = 0.12; t = 26, p <0.05). Therefore, this research assumes that H2 is supported, or leader -

When the leader projects orientation, execution, and moral voices, the follower determines whether the leader 's words and actions resonate. Leaders and followers participate in human dynamics in their common responsibilities of day-to-day work of subordinates, culture and work groups and teams. In-house, the quality of leadership voice is being strictly monitored. Missions, strategies, and key initiatives are obvious to everyone. Corporate culture is actively cultivated and healthy. Leaders are based on integrity and constantly improve their wishes. To optimize business impact and human development, carefully manage the relationship between the manager and his / her superiors. Is the leader transparent - is not it? Electricity will move to the company's lowest level - it is not so. The team is chartered and operated efficiently and shows a high level of shared responsibility.

Moral use We expect that the relationship between moral reasoning and moral leadership is particularly strong for people with high moral utilization. The idea behind moral use is that it differs not only in the ability of an individual to infer moral reasoning but also in terms of the actual degree of using the ability to think in principle in moral decision making . The moral use score (Thoma, Rest, & Davison, 1991) is evaluated by Defined Problem Test (Rest, 1979) which is a commonly used measure of moral judgment. Given the reasonable correlation between moral judgment and behavior, user score is developed as a moderator that can explain the strength of this relationship. Schminke, Ambrose, and Neubaum (2005) found that ethical use strengthens the relationship between the leader's cognitive ethical development and the moral atmosphere within the organization.