The Moral Disposition of War

Moral trend of war On December 7, 1941, the attack on Pearl Harbor was the day when a flood of unreasonable turmoil was opened to the soil of the United States. In many of the historical stories, President Roosevelt's regime problem caused the problem of Pearl Harbor's attack against US participation in World War II. It was rounded up later and was towed by a camp in the western United States.

(Ethical) trends are related to simple abilities, activities, or actual emotions, as described below. We were born without a moral inclination, but we were able to gain a trend. Those with character do not necessarily use it at a specific point, but you can use it immediately. Brave people do not necessarily feel confident, but in a dangerous situation she is confident. It is also possible to go too far and make a moral error. A generous virtue is the average among jealous, too much, or wrong kings. The advantage of assigning justice means overkilling one person and overkilling one person. The virtue of courage lies between cowardly with excessive fear and foolish acts with insufficient fear.

Finally, Aristotle is prepared to discuss certain moral virtues. Starting with courage, he mentioned two emotions, fear and confidence here. The tendency of excessive confidence is reckless, the tendency of excessive fear and lack of confidence is weak. When it becomes the pleasure and pain of a certain body, the average is discreet. Surplus is wealthy, but little happiness flaws have occurred. Aristotle introduced these two virtues in Volume 3 in more detail, but the basic idea still exists. The advantage of each case is the average between the two extremes, and the extreme value is the opposite. Therefore, virtue is a reliable method that can respond appropriately (with no excess or deficiency) with proper emotion with proper emotion, take appropriate action (neither too much nor too much).