The Moral Ambiguity of Julius Caesar

British writer Philip Pullman once wrote like this. "I am no longer thinking that we have some kind of power and evil power outside of us, we have begun to believe that good and evil are people's names, not people's names." (Goodreads.com ) Pullman's quotes and morals on the act of being a source of good and evil are closely related to the principles of correctness and badness or the principles of human values.As for thousands of years, philosophers , Ordinary people, and writers have been thinking about what human morality is.

In William Shakespeare play 'The tragedy of Julius Caesar' the character Marcus Brutus meets the definition of tragic heroes and Julius Seth. Marcus Brutus is a close friend of Julius Caesar, but it is not enough. He has moral values ​​dealing with Rome and its people. Like other tragic heroes, he has a wonderful commitment, ability, and character's integrity. He has a tragic flaw. He has a desire. By the value of Brutus, he joined Caesar's conspiracy against Caesar. The reason why Brutus joined this is mainly because he does not want Caesar to give up Rome, so there is a reason to kill Caesar. If Brutus is not included in the drama, "Tragedy of Julius Caesar" has no "tragedy". Sezer proved to be a tragic hero by showing him that he was a historical person with a tragic flaw that led to his downfall and that Caesar accepted his fate of death.

Brutus is a morally contending character at Shakespeare's play Julius Caesar. He loves his friend Julius Caesar, but he loves his country and the people of Rome. Brutus agreed to be part of the assassination of his friend as he was afraid of the power of Caesar and allowed him to be manipulated by others using his good nature. When Brutus was convinced that killing Caesar was the best for the country, he solved his moral conflict; he persuaded himself Ritual murders do not kill manpower than cold blood killing did.