Natural cultivation in the meaning of nature and cultivation in dichotomy are the subjects that have always existed in many fields of psychology. But please use it as a dichotomy to talk about whether it is correct or not. of course not. This is like saying that they never act together, are contradictory and mutually exclusive.
In this psychology course, I learned a lot about the topics applied to my daily life. One of the concepts I learned in class was nature and child rearing (or Nazism and empiricism). Discussions between nature and cultivation have a greater impact on you; we are inherently natural (nature) or have the property of being acquired (cultivation) through personal experience. In my opinion, I personally think that cultivation will have greater influence on individuals.
Natural cultivation in the meaning of nature and cultivation in dichotomy are the subjects that have always existed in many fields of psychology. But please use it as a dichotomy to talk about whether it is correct or not. of course not
Nature is a legacy that parents inherit to their children, and parenting is the way parents take their children. Psychology generally refers to "Parenting children to nature: the ultimate outcome depends on the way they plow it." The lack of cultivation can destroy the best efforts of nature. 2 pages) Harris (1998) opposed this statement, as we did in many psychology textbooks and articles, as we did not believe that raising should be classified as a synonym for the environment, these two By using the terms interchangeably we can deduce the factors that affect children's development and the factors the genes are caused by their parents.Harris called it a cultivation hypothesis and she refutes this hypothesis Then it showed that what the child learned at home might be irrelevant to the outside world, which shows the power of nature and does not indicate the power of cultivation.