The Look at three Integrated Theories

Synthesis theory is a combination of two or three theories that provides much explanation for the cause of the crime compared to traditional criminal theory (Lilly et al. 2010). The purpose of the comprehensive theory is to help explain the cause of criminal activity and the cause of criminal behavior. The resulting discussion can use a comprehensive theory to explain all criminal acts. A comprehensive theory explains some aspects of crime well and causes it to deviate, but a single theory can not explain why an individual is involved in a crime.

This article focuses on three major sociological theories of crime and crime: stress, social learning and control theory. Then a brief introduction to several other important criminal theories, most of them representing the interpretation of these three theories. Finally, a brief description of the effort to develop a comprehensive criminal theory. All described theories explain the crime according to the social environment including family, school, colleague group, workplace, community and society. However, these theories differ from each other in several ways. Focus on certain different characteristics of the social environment and focus on explaining individual differences in crime while providing various social situations leading to crime. Differences in detectives (eg why some communities have higher crime rates than other communities)

Three theoretical perspectives of functionalism theory, conflict theory and symbolic interaction theory lead sociological thinking of social problems. These views are seeing the same social problem, but they do so in different ways. Their shared view provides a more comprehensive understanding of social issues than any view. Table 1 "Theoretical Snapshot" is a summary of three viewpoints. Social stability is necessary for a strong society and social stability requires complete socialization and social integration. The social social system plays an important function to ensure social stability. Slow social change is desirable, but rapid social change threatens social order

Abstract: This research extends and integrates theory from three aspects: institution theory, family and service system. As time goes by, the core family facilities have provided stability and meaning over the long term to the market and social life. The findings show that consumers use the service system to integrate or justify their social groups and that members or groups move over time. In terms of institutional theory, these consumers can be considered seeking legitimacy or social recognition in order to seek social relationships they want to integrate into the service system. They are using services provided by the company to achieve this legitimacy. Thus, according to the results of the survey, the institution shows that consumers form and influence how to jointly build a service system to legalize social groups.