The Life and Death of Great American Cities by Jane Jacob

In Jane Jacobs's prominent "life, death, and death in the American metropolis," she explained the illness of the city and the illness of the metropolitan society in a complicated way by solving several binary files through the course I will. . One of the more culturally important dualisms Jacobs relied on in his story was an effective contradiction between diversity and homogeneity of the then urban environment. In particular, beginning with Chapter 13 and beginning with Chapter 13, Jacob is extremely concerned about the extensive misunderstanding of urban diversity.

In "The Death and Life of the Great American City", Jane Jacobs considers city utopia of the 19th century "very good". "If you are kind, do not make your own plan" The ideal, or statistical data she writes is a small existing success to understand the most important things for the place and its people For example, this is a popular Tiki hut - "build on that and build on that. When trying to imagine the feelings of today's residents about the Margarita Building in 20 to 30 years, I came back to the tiki hut where everyone is welcoming, I asked the 55-year-old building and Kelly Santantis Why did they live across the streets of Moxx? Margaritaville Does it attract a certain type of person, or does the atmosphere of that place change people who live there?

In her book, the death and life of the great city of America, Jane Jacobs discussed the importance of safety and security on the street. The success of the city is inevitably due to the safety and safety of the street. That failure gave residents discomfort, and that is only the beginning of the problem. (Jacobs, The Death and Life of America's Great City, 1961) This reasoning came from the cognitive theory of the brain. According to this theory observations made by people are stored as part of the brain as a database of memories. The human brain continuously interprets each instance by cross - referencing all sensory inputs in memory. After that, that person responds to the environment based on that reasoning. (TED, 2003)