The Levels of Processing in a Judgement and Recall Task

Based on the famous Craik & Tulving (1975) model, 114 undergraduates participated in the processing level experiments. Participants were offered shallow, medium, or meaningful words in 60 trials, then 120 tests, including half of the original words, were tested. The results of the study show that participants are aware that semantic words are better than shallow words and intermediate words, which means that attention of meaning brings about a stronger memory trace through the use of attention .

The purpose of dealing with experimental level is to decide whether deeper processing leads to better reproduction. The experimental hypothesis (H1) will have a significant positive correlation between deep processing and vocabulary recall. Since this experiment was accepted, the null hypothesis (H 0) was rejected, which indicates this, and there is no significant positive correlation between deep processing and word recall. The meaning is clearly shown in the figure. Furthermore, the significance level of P <0.001 was confirmed by the results of one-way ANOVA and post hoc test. According to descriptive statistics, mean and standard deviation show a compelling difference between glyph and semantic condition. Again, the assumption is accepted and null is rejected

Next, we explain the processing level, the orientation task, and the four conditions. Next, I explained three premises as to what the results will look like. First, if the learning intention is important, those who are warned beforehand for remembrance testing (two intentional groups) are better than those who do not (accidentally), regardless of the level of treatment You ought to go. Secondly, regardless of whether they know the recall test, if the depth of treatment is important, people who evaluate the pleasure of words (two deep groups) are those who make E / G checks Shallow group) should be recalled more. Third, if both the level of treatment and the intent of learning are important, the group (deep / conscious group) who creates a score of pleasure and is warned about the recall test is better than the other three conditions It should work. I will investigate the students and see what kind of assumption they think will be supported.

We expect college students who use deep processing in word stimulation tasks to remember more words than shallow words. This hypothesis was supported by this study as students undergoing empirical evaluation remember more than two other words. According to Craik and Lockhart (1972), this is because participants with empirical evaluation criteria are dealt with thoroughly by additional meanings. This is consistent with past studies in which semantically processed words are recalled more frequently than shallowly processed words (eg Barker, McInerney, & Dowson, 2002; Innocenti et al., 2010; Kronlund & Whittlesea, 2005; Malmberg & Shiffrin, 2005). ) There is no big difference between the conditions of the number of syllables and the number of vowels, both of which require shallow processing, so this confirms the theory of depth of processing.