The Last Chance Wilderness

It is absolutely clear that Congress has to decide to manage federal land in eastern Oregon as a national park. In this article, I will verify this claim from a strong ecological point of view. Wild habitats have diverse wildlife, uncontaminated resources, and undeveloped land and have the ultimate value to find human value. For this reason, human value can not be replaced with natural intrinsic value. Congress will succeed in making moral decisions in managi by prohibiting breeding of livestock in the park, allowing non-invasive activities in the park and prohibiting the prediction of predators in the park .

Thanks to the wilderness area of ​​heaven - the original place that humans are not accustomed to usually. In the mid of the last century, the Wilderness Act of 1964 was enacted, Congress confirmed that wild areas of the country remained wild as the Congress pioneered in the wilderness. These areas can be part of the National Land Park, the National Wildlife Sanctuary, and the common land managed by state-owned forest or land management. There are about 680 wilderness areas with more than 160 million acres in 44 states. They can remain wild for a long time

Wilderness is a special name for public land and has not been developed at all. The concept of the wilderness area was defined by the law of the Wilderness Act of 1964. The wilderness area can be managed by one of the above mentioned federal agencies and some parks and shelters are almost exclusively designated as wilderness. The wilderness research area is a land with wild function and is managed as a wilderness, but it is not designated by the wilderness of Congress. The concept of officially specifying and protecting public land dates back to our first national park. When you designate a park as a public area, protection is another matter. Theodore Roosevelt and his protective organizations Boone and Crockett have something that is available by enacting laws and regulations to protect these national treasures.

Roderick Nash 's work "Wilderness and American Mind" in 1967 is a pioneering work of contemporary wild scholarship. Through the passage of the wilderness law, it follows the history of wild concepts of ancient attitudes towards nature. Nash drew the story as a long-term indignation of appreciation for the wilderness. Although there is no criticism, most of this work is a festival of the wilderness tradition and conservation movement, and it has permanent popularity of backpackers and activists and a permanent impact on scholarship. Most of the wilderness scholarship after Nash 's work is basically designed to supplement or modify the general situation.