The Killer of Hope: Euthanasia

When asked "Why is it important to accept euthanasia?", The answer is always to protect the patient from suffering, but why should you adopt a naive solution when there is hope? Take some time to think about how people can say goodbye to the one he loves. The answer is obvious, it is impossible to give up on the people we love. So, whether you are opposed to it or euthanasia, you should be held on the next line. Euthanasia or so-called death by a doctor is expected to stop people's life in the event of illness termination.

"Elephant" comes from two words in Greek. Positive euthanasia can be defined as "causing severe pain, but causing death of a person without real hope of recovery". Active motoneuria is often called "euthanasia" as motivation for expression is usually to clear pain. I define passive euthanasia as "if you choose to deliberately offer a patient life support, surgery or medication or do not intentionally withdraw, you may die." It actually did not require a life, but he allowed the person to survive or die without special medical efforts to make that person alive. (Through "extraordinary" efforts, I refer to medical equipment, surgery, chemotherapy and other treatments in addition to basic food, water, warmth, care and personal attention.

Advocates of euthanasia argue that active euthanasia is not morally worse than passive euthanasia - discontinue or detain any treatment that will cause the patient to die. According to this view, some people think it should allow active euthanasia just like allowing passive euthanasia. James Rachel is a famous euthanasia supporter that supports this view. He pointed out that there is no moral difference between killing and death, as the intention is usually based on utilitarian arguments. He explains this argument using two hypothesis scenarios. In the first scenes, Smith predicted that if there was something to do with a six - year - old cousin, he inherited inheritance and there is a risk of killing the child while taking a bath. In the same situation, even if something happened to a six - year - old cousin, Jones tried to fortake her cousin in good fortune and tried to drown and witnessed the cousin drowning accidentally and dying.

Active euthanasia refers to euthanasia caused by acts such as injection of a fatal drug and passive euthanasia refers to euthanasia caused by omission of a certain action. Traditionally, active euthanasia is different from passive euthanasia. The latter stops or discontinues treatment, whereas the former is actively killed. However, the famous philosopher James Rachels thinks that "active euthanasia is not worse than passive euthanasia". His argument is that the results are the same and two actions lead to the death of the patient, so there is no difference between euthanasia, morally, morally and actively.