The Key Turning Points in Warfare From 1845 to 1918

As the nature of war has changed, the ability to deal with these technological advances is also evolving. Weapons may be more harmful and this time the number of casualties will increase and injuries will be more serious. Therefore, in order to maintain a high population, medicine must adapt to changes in weapons, otherwise war will be lost, winning will be easier, and the number of deaths will increase. The Crimean War, the American Civil War, the 2nd Wild Boar War and the World War I promoted the advancement of medicine in four wars within a certain period of time.

With this short sketch, two important problems emerged. First of all, what kind of conditions are necessary for various ways to make war ongoing in many parts of the world a powerful force for institutional improvement and social transformation? For example, what is the role of simultaneous economic growth in creating such a situation? What is the role of a semi-closed and culturally consistent national system as a background of this kind of war? Second, what factors will affect the results for each period? In other words, how can we explain the common type of era that not only produces the most successful traditional civilization model in China but also produces the most fundamental deviations of traditional European models? Are all results in Japan? These questions can not be answered within the scope of this article, but provide some framework for this investigation.

Question 3, which evaluates the extent to which the United States participated in the First World War (1917 - 1918), indicated the turning point of the role of the state in world affairs. Please explain what happened in the development of your discussion and what did not change from before the war to the next era. (Historical Thinking Skill: Staging). Maximum possible point: 6 Please be careful. Unlike previous and subsequent development, it is similar. - It is completely blank. Note on valuation: If you ask the prompts to evaluate the turning point for these two points, the response needs to be discussed before and after development. For these two points, if the prompt needs to evaluate the characteristics of the era, the response can discuss development before and after development.