The Justice of Nuremberg

It is 10 am now. November 20, 1945. World War II ended. Jeffrey Lawrence, UK Supreme Court chief, voiced the indictment aloud. An international military trial for Nazi war criminals began. The accused made their request: everyone is "innocent". This test may be the most important test in American history. It always sets the direction of war crimes afterwards. It has been prosecuted in four countries: the United States, the UK, the Soviet Union, and France. It is important that the world has a stable international judicial system even when some government collapses even during the war.

In order to trial Nazi war criminals, the Nuremberg trial was a series of 13 trials that took place in Nuremberg, Germany, between 1945 and 1949. Suspects included Nazi party officials and senior military officers charged with crimes of peace infringement and crimes against humanity, as well as German businessmen, lawyers and doctors. Nazi leader Adolf Hitler (1889-1945) committed suicide and never tried. At that time, the legal basis of the trial and its procedural innovation was controversial, but the Nuremberg trial became a milestone in the establishment of a permanent international court, and the importance of subsequent genocide and other criminal cases It was a precedent. Human race

Nuremberg's ruling is a fictitious story of a trial for war crimes and judges and prosecutors serving the Nazis. Nuremberg's decision was the first benchmark principle of national leaders in the management of river basins, ie judicial and international law, which fought against war against aggression and crimes against humanity. This film is a sensational, provocative and searchable ethical problem surrounding the behavior of the accused and bringing justice to them. The document also explores whether an ordinary German is responsible for the Holocaust.

First, Nuremberg trial. Nuremberg represented America's justice and politicians' victory, celebrating the era of modern human rights and the international criminal law, treating the prisoner's abuse as a crime, strengthening the principle of governance responsibility, and starting with sovereignty of the state as the sovereignty of the state. Protection of the potential protection of perpetrators of crime against humanitarian processes from the long-term judicial system, secondly, the Geneva Convention. Like most major human rights treaties adopted and ratified in my country in the last century, the Geneva Convention forbids all cruel, inhuman and grave treatment of all prisoners. Thousands of American soldiers are benefiting from these practices.

Full text: Alberto Mora discusses torture and cruel and inhuman treatment of detainees in William V. O'Brien international law and ethics lecture at Georgetown