The Jury System

In modern times the right to be heard by a jury has originated in the 12th century England during the reign of Henry II. Such a system may be derived from "his equality legal ruling or" Land Act "(Thomas)" that the accused can only judge at ancient rights. For many people, the jury system is the most equitable institution and seems to be the most equitable way to determine human innocence or guilt.

The jury system consists of twelve people who participate in crime and civic activities and make decisions on de facto issues. In the UK, the jury system has a history of about 800 years. When the jury system developed in the UK, those times were called the age of darkness, then the jury needed to investigate the case itself. Previously it was expected to be guilty or not guilty. If the jury fails to reach agreement after a certain period of time, it is permissible to decide the majority of 10-2 and the judge can decide whether to accept such a judgment.

In the 12th century, Henry II took an important step in the development of the jury system. Henry II established a system to use the jury to solve the land dispute. Twelve free jury juries were assigned to mediate in these disputes. Like the Saxon system, these people are accused of revealing the facts of the incident, not listening to the discussions in court. Henry II also introduced the so-called "big jury" through his Clarendon tour. According to the agreement, a jury consisting of free agents was accused of reporting any crime they knew to their "righteousness in justice", and the judge tracked hundreds of people. Criminals condemned by this jury were severely tried

Part of the democratic institution is the jury system - those who are accused of crime are judged by his companion. Today, the jury system usually consists of 12 people, but in ancient Athens the entire parliament was chosen randomly using a machine called Keller Standard. This device randomly distributes the token. If you have a black one, you must do the jury service on that day. This system ensures that no one knows who will be the jury on that day and hence can not afford someone to influence their decision. In a carefully considered system, the jury can even compensate for their expenses.