The Jury Selection Procedure in the English Legal System

Jury selection process in British legal system The theory behind the modern jury of the jury can be traced back to about 800 years, the 63rd Magna Carta (1215). "A free person must not be arrested, imprisoned, deprived of property, deprived, banished, destroyed, or destroyed in any way unless judged by the law of his colleague Land Act" "Magnacarta is a British nobleman And the jurisdiction of free people through their fellow group.

The role of the jury in the UK legal system remains part of the controversy of the justice system. Due to the selection problem of the jury, complications, cost and longevity of each exam, jury's experience and wisdom were called juries. a) the jury lacks the intelligence and experience necessary to process complex trials and make fair decisions, b) the insufficient number of people from ethnic minorities, especially minorities, c) the number of juries Lots of information sources that prove that choice and trial period is too long The length of unprocessed time indicates the need to rethink the whole process of the jury trial. Some former jury members have a more negative opinion on the use of jurors about many other problems that mostly do not know about the law, instructions are not clearly stated, whether it is not possible to judge whether to ignore the evidence, Some people tend to have a tendency.

The jury plays an essential role in the development of the British justice system. As more and more legal controversies are submitted to the jury to solve, the system becomes more self-aware. Judges and juries are concerned that they make decisive decisions based on irrelevant and unreliable evidence. Litigation parties complained that the trial proceedings are arbitrary, arbitrary, and unfair. The failing party seeks effective remedies to rectify the erroneous decision made in the court of the first instance. Each of these issues is reflected in the American modern judicial system.