The Issues Posed by Blaming Victims of Rape

In modern North America, if you ask nearly every member of society what the most atrocious crime human beings can commit, rape is almost certain to enter the top five. Perhaps it will even compete for number one position. It is unlikely to think that a rational person can not discover rape (or the broader sexual assault being used in Canada) is an unpleasant act that will not become a real human being, even ridiculous I will. However, to know this, that is, the overwhelming majority of North American society's citizens are getting consensus on the essence of this crime.

Abstract: The practice of rape culture and victim condemnation is inherently interrelated and common in American society. The existence of rape culture normalizes sexual violence and accuses attacking rape victims. This will affect the criminal justice system in the United States and will affect the outcome of the rape trial and the treatment of rape victims. In particular, as a main source of rape culture for many years, discussion by media and depictation of rape were seen, and the influence of these media rape on the results of actual rape trials was also investigated. Review of relationship of rape culture, victim's condemnation, practice of media and criminal justice, and possible solutions

Sharing of criminal science, sharing of criminal science and criminal justice, and part of sex and sexual sharing

► Characteristics of observers and victims will affect criticism of rape victims. ► RMA, integration of roles by sex, use of drugs may affect the responsibility of rape victims. ► Men show higher RMA and higher level victim responsibilities. ► Women who violate traditional sexual roles should be criticized. ► Drunken victims are accused of being more than the victims who are awake

The rape case is attributed to the rape mythology, the integration of gender roles, and the impact of material use on victim's accusations.

The criticism of the victim is part of the phenomenon known as "acceptance of rape myth" created by researcher Martha Burt in the 1980s. It is defined as prejudice and racial prejudice about rape, rape victims, rapists, including pointing out rape contempt, rejection of extensive rape, plaintiffs' liars, and pointing out that most rape claims are false Because she is defined as a hearing impaired, recognition of the damage caused by a particular form of sexual violence, or acceptance of the "worthful" of the victim. Another reason for victim's condemnation is that if the victim wants to have sex with the perpetrator, the meaning of rape is ambiguous. If the victim wants to have sex but refuses to agree to sex and keeps the criminal, the situation will be considered rape, but it is easier to denounce the victim to "want to have sex" .

Damage the responsibility for the behavior that the victim is not just taken by the victim. Many victims, especially female victims of rape, explain how criminals, not surrounding people, are accusing them. This is called "sniper victim" in the literature. The criticism of the victim can be explained as a process that is condemned that the victim was affected as the perpetrator needs to have a problem. Victims are different from "two victims" in attitude and behavior. These differences are the cause of damage. There are also views that victims can avoid future crimes by changing actions and thoughts (Ryan, 1971).