Gay Lynch said in her article that ethics / time frame / resource prose writers are not strictly considering ethics in almost all moral debate. Landscape, history, name, or story? "(2005). In the Oxford dictionary, since morality is defined as" standard of rights and behavior, moral principle "(2011), the moral problem in writing a novel is the writer's responsibility and his moral It is necessary to understand. It is standard.
Let's think about this blog: it's a guide to writing traditional novels under the approach "write what you do not know". Here, simply by writing inexperienced questions and scenarios, we will briefly explain how writers "break down the traces of writing". Do you have a problem? In the second part of the blog post, the author tests the method and asks the author to write some small pieces in the comments section. This is one: there is no movie function to help you, the writer will rely on the explanation to make the story look persuasive. But you have not believed it yet. Is this because the author sacrificed descriptive credibility? Interpretation with no breathing space or subjective complexity
I started thinking about all this, and I wrote this blog post three years ago. At the moment, all of these have already begun, and many people are not considering these issues. There are imaginary materials of Dystopia, but I think this is impossible or I think that it is very far in the future. Since then, the technology world has begun to recognize its impact, and these ideas are turning into mainstream dialogue. In this world, we are already improving our abilities. You can search reliable sources right away, you can instantly do complex calculations and manage housing in other countries. Language allows us to go quickly anywhere on the surface of the earth 100 years ago.