The military moral war continues to be an action that humans must take. There are various reasons for war. Anger, passion, greed, defense, and religion. If the difference is solved or compromised by mediation or the burning of a violent passion with the opponent, war is the last option left. Obviously, the purpose of any war is to win. How did you win the war? Perhaps if we asked the Ministry of Defense at the early stages of the Iraq war, his answer is "To win this war, we forced to give over to the enemy through a moral war It must be ". Marines
Military ethics includes issues related to the use of force and soldier's spirit. This is well understood as appropriate occupational ethics. In general, war theory is considered to be able to set background conditions of military ethics. However, individual countries and traditions have different concerns of concern. Public sector ethics is a set of principles that leads public officials to include their decisions on behalf of their supporters as they serve their supporters. The concept of public sector ethics is based on the fact that decisions and actions are based on what is best fulfilled by the interests of civil servants (including economic benefits) or selfish political benefits.
Considering normal death, confrontation, and ignorance, people often do not associate war and morality with each other. But in the example of "military ethics: what everyone should know" writer George Lucas thinks ethics is not only indispensable for military activities but also more complex than "good and evil". If they are an inevitable part of our attempt to stop the worst, we will not criticize the only way to do this. Simply put, the use of deadly power is morally justified only when war is the only way we can use to prevent or avoid worse things.