The Impact of Zero Tolerance Policies

The zero tolerance policy dating back to the mid-1990s initially addressed problems such as drugs and weapons. As time went on, the school expanded the list of punishable crimes and created more disciplinary problems. These policies at public schools oblige students to be punished or suspended in the form of penalties for certain violations. The goal of these policies is to promote the safety of all students and employees. If you violate the rules, students will be punished without exception.

Therefore, the problem is to evaluate the impact of zero tolerance research base on student behavior and school climate, despite school's implementation of zero tolerance policy for 20 years and being a federal government policy for nearly 15 years It is insufficient for it. Even more worrying is that most research results in existing zero tolerance and exclusion studies tend to contradict philosophical assumptions.

Zero tolerance policy is a school disciplinary policy that sets certain results or penalties for specific crimes. According to the definition of zero tolerance policy, the policy that "irrational rules and policies are the same for all people, but unfairly influence people sharing specific attributes" is always discriminatory. The zero tolerance approach was originally introduced in the 1980s. Reducing drug use at school In the 1990s, zero tolerance policy was more widely used. In order to reduce the violence of the gun, "school law there is no farm" of 1994 (GFSA) is, to the protected school in the capital of the federal government, to expel a student to bring a gun to school or school district during the calendar year policy We are seeking to "make" it. Since students are participating in local law enforcement agencies, the distinction between law school violations and laws has become unclear.

Lawrence - These rules are designed to deal with problems such as violence, weapons, drugs or other illegal acts when the school implements zero tolerance policy. Therefore, "zero tolerance" policy is used to punish behavioral problems including inappropriate clothing and other minor offenses. Like many disciplinary actions, the impact on black students is particularly serious. Researchers at the University of Kansas have asked for more research on zero tolerance policy and co-authored a study to enable policy makers and educators to consider the impact of these policies on color students, especially black women did.

Stephen Hoffman pointed out in his article "zero benefit: estimate the impact of zero tolerance disciplinary policy on national differences in school discipline", "... zero tolerance discipline policy and poor school atmosphere, low student achievement, high A dropout rate is associated ... "In a school of juvenile courts students should follow a series of rules. Court school rules differ from traditional school rules; they are more penalized. Two major issues of juvenile accommodation centers and long-term detention facilities have been discussed and discussed, overcrowding and ineffectiveness. Since the number of minors has increased in the past 15 years, the accommodation period of minors in safe and closed facilities is also increasing. As a result, these systems become populous and overcrowded.