Discussion on the support of choice and the support of life has been going on for many years and is a controversial issue in society. Author of the book, why abortion is an abortion Don Marquis tells the reader why killing is a fundamental feature of mistake and applies to the fetus based on personality. Marquez first began with questions and figured out why the killing is a fundamental reason for assuming a mistake. Normally, people will conclude that killing is wrong for two reasons. The first reason is that destroying human life is wrong.
I can not claim that abortion is unethical and legitimate. Otherwise, autonomy of pregnant women will become a universal moral problem. The most common way to make this moral judgment is to equate abortion with murder. Infringement of personal autonomy is wrong, murder is wrong. Most people agree that murder is more serious (although this is a more difficult problem if infringement of autonomy is slavery against movable property). Discussion on law abortion relies on the widely accepted concept that the state should legally prohibit murder. If abortion = homicide hypothesis does not exist, pregnancy abortion is significantly weaker than asserting that women who are pregnant are forced to take for a long time.
Berny Belvedere answered my question and insisted that the unethical behavior of abortion exceeded this concern and forced women to postpone pregnancies that are not sufficiently undesirable to account for the province for accountability. According to Belvedere it is impossible to think that abortion should be immoral and legitimate. By contrast, the next article, Arc, Part 3 of the discussion on the problem of abortion ethics - abortion is not only immoral, but I think it should be legal, but it is most preventable. Position Essentially, the moral value of the fetus is greater than zero, but less than one person, its value is enough to prove that the state is committing unethical behavior that infringes the physical self-governing of women Absent.