The History of the Jury System

The jury system is basically descendants of the UK, Greece, Rome and Egypt. Colonialism played an important role in the development of the global jury system. However, despite colonial influences, the judicial system around the world takes its own approach. Therefore, the jury system evolved and changed to meet the needs and social conscience of various countries. Around the world, the jury judges and judges the facts in the jury trial, the accuracy of the testimony, the guilty or innocence of the criminal defendant, and the responsibility in the civil litigation.

The jury system consists of twelve people who participate in crime and civic activities and make decisions on de facto issues. In the UK, the jury system has a history of about 800 years. When the jury system developed in the UK, those times were called the age of darkness, then the jury needed to investigate the case itself. Previously it was expected to be guilty or not guilty. If the jury fails to reach agreement after a certain period of time, it is permissible to decide the majority of 10-2 and the judge can decide whether to accept such a judgment.

Therefore, I would like to discuss the role and composition of the jury system in the jury system history and the UK legal system. First, the modern jury started with the ancient custom of many ancient Germanic tribes. There, groups of people with good character were used for criminal investigation and accused court trials. The same custom developed into the medieval German automobile court system as well. At Anglo-Saxon in the UK, the jury investigated the crime. After the conquest of Norman in 1066, a jury was appointed as a means of criminal investigation in several places in the country.

In the 12th century, Henry II took an important step in the development of the jury system. Henry II established a system to use the jury to solve the land dispute. Twelve free jury juries were assigned to mediate in these disputes. Like the Saxon system, these people are accused of revealing the facts of the incident, not listening to the discussions in court. Henry II also introduced the so-called "big jury" through his Clarendon tour. According to the agreement, a jury consisting of free agents was accused of reporting any crime they knew to their "righteousness in justice", and the judge tracked hundreds of people. Criminals condemned by this jury were severely tried