The history of mathematics has become an important research from ancient times to the present day, which is the basis of scientific, engineering and philosophical progress. Mathematics starts with counting. Babylonia mathematics was developed from 2000B.C. Local value symbols have been developed for a long time with radix 60 as the radix. Starting from at least 1700 B. C to study numerical problems. We studied linear equations in the context of solving numerical problems. Since the major advance in mathematics in Greece ranged from 300 BC to 200 AD, the foundation of mathematics was handed down by Greeks and independent by Greeks.
Covering the complete mathematical history is as hard work as the theme itself. But there is one sure thing. There are brains for human beings to organize things around. For this reason they will continue to calculate everything at hand. Mathematics is as old as civilization itself, ancient Egyptians, Chinese, Greek, Maya, Babylonians use impressive works with their mathematical knowledge, as seen in earlier literature and relics It developed.
When I grew up, all my friends were like experts - they were excellent in mathematics and sentences, but there was nothing else. On the other hand, I am studying a series of courses consisting of mathematics, business, history and political science. Therefore, discussion between generalist and expert was always in my mind. However, now is the time to resolve this debate at once. Because the world is changing. It is not a turning point of the century. Technology changes our world from day to day. That's changing the way we interact, learn, and even buy food. But the most terrible thing is that it makes the work obsolete. The problem of automation is not new in our era or even in history. At this point, some white color jobs will necessarily be automated. Your work, whatever it is, may be carried over by your lifelong machine.
I think that history book of mathematics has entertainment value, I am here; I do not dislike mathematics itself, the premise of mathematical history is not so. It is too attractive. Perhaps because I clearly mistakenly believe that the history of this field should be fairly linear (even if there are interesting topics in the conversation). ) I am looking forward to more "today, A and B, and C" without limit to today. For example, I do not understand how important the concept of the same name is for mathematical development. If you really think about it, the infinite concept is slightly dazzling and difficult to adjust. Of course, to some extent this is subject to an indirect influence on university level mathematics, but I think most of what I consider as a matter of course (and as I assume many other people assume) I took it.