The Grim Conclusions of the Largest-Ever Study of Fake News

Our robot siblings can not blame this problem. During the period from 2006 to 2016, the survey found that the Twitter robot expanded the false story while expanding the actual story. The author wrote that fake news that "human beings are more likely to spread it than robots" has prospered.

The conclusion is basically that social networks are to process, expand and promptly disseminate erroneous information and there is no obvious way to solve it. These are truly human problems, so these networks are getting worse

Of course, this is obvious unless you agree that social network is bad and do not remove it

When you post a logical conclusion of a fake news source (for everyone "a real indifference"?), Things start to become very serious. People who predict some crazy political results in 2016 are very worried and I think we should be very worried. "What will happen, whatever happens if something can appear to be happening?" Is a good question. #farcebook # fakenewsClippers Maximize ideas What will happen if the fraudulent AI designed to create experimental paper clips becomes out of control and eventually convert all the materials of the universe into paper clips? Obviously this sounds silly. But let us consider a bit coin block chain. It is not artificial intelligence, but if it became wrongful and happy - and unconsciously - will you drill down on all the power of the earth? This is obviously not designed for this purpose, but maximizing thought experiments is the focus of paper clips. #I gained weight

According to a survey by Stanford University, there were over 30 million imitations in the presidential election campaign in 2016. Fake news is a very complicated and multifaceted problem, there is no simple solution. Therefore, we decided to adopt a multifaceted approach to false news problems. A value guarantee contract is a means to distinguish and reward valuable content while preventing the dissemination of fake news and content from contradicting the community's values. Differentiating valuable contributors is an important part of the agreement, and in order to achieve this we will have a wide reputation system.

One of the aims of our research is to determine whether false news is likely to harm the reporting method of the actual news organization. Simple answer: It is true. For the past three years, I found that false reports have influenced the themes of international relations. In other words, whenever fake news makes a story about international relations, news organizations will react within 5 days. What we did not measure was whether the news organization repeatedly talked about fake news websites. Interestingly, we know that both are. However, because the media was paying attention to wrong coverage, other news topics were not picked up. After all, the reporter has quite a lot of time a day. Also, between 2015 and 2016, we also found that fake news is an agenda for economic and religious topics of all online media.