The Great Fire of London, the Industrial Revolution and the Great Stink: Defining Moments in London’s City Plan

INTRODUCTION There are many things that make up cities, such as culture, needs, and awareness of cities by designers, but none of them is urgent and more than a disaster. London is a clear city, so the subject of this article. In order to prove that the impact of disaster to the city is the best means for formation, I will focus on the 1666 London fire and the 1858 fire, compare with the industrial revolution in 1760 .

From Sunday, September 2, 1666 until Thursday, September 6, 1666, the fire in London was a fire that passed all the way through the center of London in the UK. The fire destroyed the medieval city of London in the walls of ancient Romans. Although it threatened, it did not reach the aristocratic district of Westminster, the Whitehall Palace of Charles II, and most of the suburban slums. We are consuming 13,200 houses, 87 parish churches, St. Paul's Cathedral, and most municipal buildings. It is estimated that 70,000 people out of the 80,000 residents in the city were destroyed.

London in the 18th century was a smelly cave and a wonderful city. Poverty is the same in all industrial cities. It is shocking to remember, but those conditions were normal at that time. New London is an architectural feat that provides unprecedented opportunities for people. With the harshness and cruelty of life, London has become the center of industrialization in Europe in the next two centuries. I think that it is convenient to use the written text source. Comparing the two works of the same era, you can create new pictures. Poetry really conveys the emotions and reality of the subject. Please emphasize the most useful key phrases and facts when writing a paper with a copy of the text I found.