During the general strike, the government is concerned that the form of workers and TUC members is a revolutionary threat to shorten working conditions and hours of work and increase wages. From this time on, we can get a lot of evidence, please let me clearly understand the reasons for this concern and the reasons. Source 1, the British Gazette (governed by the government) has created articles in the early stages of the strike emphasizing the important issues the government felt when supporting statements and announcements:
Abrams vUS- *** According to the first revision, we believe that the market IDEAS leaflet calls for a violent revolution, seeking general strikes, and reducing the production of ammunition. Banning freedom of speech can only save the country only when necessary (especially if you have your own idea - without discrimination - the idea of Welch and appealing by Gertz) So that it can not be done). Without being based on facts Your own opinion (Gertz is embarrassed, but it did not win until winning - for him to win but for personal character) All thoughts considered - wrong idea, thought - Not European market idea (obvious opinion)
Like a revolution, a large general strike reveals the anatomy of society and provides a unique opportunity to see the true composition of society. Thus, when searching for real identity, the UK can explore the British Revolution, and France can explore France. Canadians have parallel opportunities to analyze themselves through the 1919 General Strike, but so far they have not. D.C. Masters has a monograph on this subject, from which we can drill down a lot of factual information, which shows the difficulty of understanding the authors' Western radical radicalism. A very good explanation about the strike was in Kenneth McNaught's biography of J. S. Woodsworth. The reader was cited because there is no space to narrow down such accounts from these pages.
The indeterminate general strike is different from the other strikes required by the economy. With regular strikes, workers tried to win the boss to meet their demands by eliminating the ability of the boss to earn money. The general strike is no longer profit, but asks the question "who is the owner of this house?", But without the demands of the working class, there is no rotation of the wheels and no glow of light, nobody gets the general strike Indicates whether there is power. As the workers realize that they do not provide basic services they offer to their families, the strikers themselves begin to offer these services. The strike committee was forced to expand its role to manage society and even to provide security and security (such as police). In Winnipeg, the strike committee needs to have a larger role with 300 representatives (3 in each union, 5 in the labor committee) and 5 officers.