The Future of Work, Human Rights & the Contestation of Inequality

The rights of workers in the 21st century are greatly affected by global and regional inequality. The benefits and burdens of labor are unevenly distributed; existing inequality strongly determines who can avoid harm and profit. Choosing to address challenges in this area, such as developmentism, market-based approach, local, national or international regulation, will have a major impact on long-term inequality.

Defenders of workers' rights must work in the context of a change in the global supply chain and production pattern and emphasize the drawbacks of local attempts to regulate and improve working conditions . Workers often face market pressure far beyond the scope of the political system from downstream consumers. Labor conditions and shortages have caused population migration, the health and safety of certain populations, and the environmental impact of economic activity.

In this part of the inequality project, we take into account the possibility of human rights to properly deal with these issues.

Historically, the exercise of human rights established an unexpected advantage. It can partially compensate for its genetic defects and can point to future direction of development. Although the legacy of human rights is progressive, it is narrow and controversial: strict criticism of human rights, that is too severe from the viewpoint of sovereignty, or excessive dependence on structural factors, or Western European legalism and elitism Will be affected. Hopgood, Moyn, Baxi, etc. Once again, there are many guidelines on the direction of rights as a political process: the concept of Bates' constructivism, the pragmatism of Pratt, the power to build a worldwide spirit of deSousa Santos In Goodhart, he suggested "tools" box method, and the ability of Martha Nussbaum. These examples are beyond the limit of the universal binary logic of seeing the origin of the legalist of the rights system and its own power to mobilize the social change of human rights.

This new contact with healthy inequality politics, a project that has withered since the black's report, is not a matter of modern "world that the rights to life do not want, as the human rights essentialists may want it Human Rights Declaration "again. However, in Article 3, in the logical result, the first two articles cover the general human tendency to "rationality and conscience" among subjects. [The new world is established not only by assertions and new identity but also by a new perspective on political goods and targets. Looking at the movement of political change from the perspective of assertion or concentrating this movement on the political or identity politics of rights restricts our understanding of new political events and narrows our political desires It may be (p. 48).

• Human rights framework provides a framework for dealing with a wide range of social determinants of health and health disparities. Human rights on this point is the civil and political rights under the "European Convention on Human Rights and Basic Freedom" and the "International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights" and the "International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights" Varies. In particular, the "European Social Charter" and the "International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights" and the Unconfidential United Nations General Review