The Future of the Global Liberal Order

After 70 years of operation, the global freedom order is threatened. The future of free democracy, open markets, and common security agreements is unresolved. From the occurrence of populism to the expansion of protectionism and trade war, red flags are raised everywhere

Questions that everyone is asking - Can these trends be reversed? If so, will the global liberal order be updated and appropriate in the 21st century? If the world liberalism order collapses, will it be replaced by something fundamentally different?

This series of articles planned by Linde is exploring the crisis the world liberalism order faces without being influenced domestically and abroad and the influence of the international order after the west side.

Looking to the future, Can the global liberal order survive internal and external shocks? Steven Pinker is a historic force supporting liberal democracy - liquidity, urbanization, I believe that education and connection - will not end soon. International pressures to promote gender, ethnicity, and social equality are also small. Defenders Pinker and other liberal projects insisted that they had a historical victory. After all, authoritarian populism is a game for the elderly. Its supporters are often male, religious, low educational standards and ethnic. They complain that their country is a stranger and often does not like immigrants or global governance. A new study on Brexit in the cardinal election and the rise of the Party's party in Europe shows that age-related support decreases

One of the challenges leading the discussion about the future of the free world order is that the power of the United States has always been the main cause of this order, but the United States has its own unique way of advancing rule-based global systems It is an incomplete practitioner of a grand strategy. Criticism of free international order is often contrary to criticism of US foreign policy or criticism of past and present American political leadership. Or if only democracy shares power and only multilateral institutions are not dominated by the great powers, or if only the country does not pursue narrow self-interests, how the fantasy world of Wonderland looks like Become.

More or less global or region. The early Western liberalism order after the war was mainly the Atlantic community and the liberal system after the Cold War had a broader global influence. The free international order can be organized more or less mainly in hegemony countries - in other words, it can be more or less hierarchical. It may be more or less reflected in formal consensus and governance institutions. Probably the most important thing is that the 'social purpose' of the free international order may be different. For example, the social objective is to provide only basic rules and institutions for limited cooperation and exchanges between liberal democracy. Alternatively, you may have "ambitious" cooperation, a "fast" social goal with a series of exhaustive consensus and joint commitments to achieve security goal integration and sharing.