The X generation tends to think that grass is a more environmentally friendly way of thinking, and the balance between work and life is important to them. The last generation is the millennium or Y generation. They were born between 1983 and 2000 and are mainly university students or new graduate students. The Millennial generation is only a small part of the current labor force, but the millennial generation with an increasing number of working years is increasing. Due to its personality, boring work and boring work are not suitable for millennium workers. They are not only expecting that all forms of technology are possible, but they also require that they be used as much as possible.
According to Nicholas (2009) today 's workforce is divided into four categories. These four groups consist of traditionalists, baby boomers, generation X, generation Y. The ratio and impact of these four groups have changed over the years. In the 21st century it will be difficult to manage the retirement baby-boomer generation, generation X and the newly entered Yers Yers workforce (Rodriguez, Green & Ree, 2003). Many researchers notice that young and older workers prefer different leadership styles. Therefore, it is necessary to understand these differences as leaders can have a huge impact on recruitment, motivation, productivity, and retention of employees. In this investigation we will try to determine the priority (if any) of the leadership style of generation X and generation Y and the possible impact it may have on management policies and decisions.
There are four basic groups related to the community organization. They are usually classified as "social groups, elementary school groups, organized development groups, and institutional relationship groups" (Brager and Specht, 1973, p. 71). Each of these groups has its own use within the organization. The extent to which a group participates in an organization throughout the organization depends on the ability of the worker to identify areas of personal concern and actively engage the participants with the cause.
Gabriel Almond (1958) identified four types of profit organizations: Nonconformity, Noncooperation, Institution and Society. The Anomic group is usually a voluntary group that shows collective reactions to specific regression. The Anom Group often lacks political communication skills. Uncooperatives are rarely organized well, and their activities depend on specific issues. Unlike atomic groups, members are usually similar to each other and have a common identity. Most institutional groups are formal and have other political or social functions besides special benefits. Collaborating organizations are specially designed to represent specific groups of issues. Institutional categories include the legislature, political executives, bureaucrats, military, and churches. These groups express their own interests or represent the interests of other groups in society. They form a group representative interest