The Formalist Critics, by Cleanth Brooks

In his 1951 paper "Formalist Critic", Kline Brooks wrote that critics' critics tried to encounter and present these arguments from his point of view even among other literary critics. Klein Brooks believes that when we see works from different perspectives of literary theory, we believe that essentially obvious literary works will lose the point of a literary work, but it is always to see literary works from a subjective point of view. I detach myself. From their own point of view, and from these points of view, he contradicts themselves.

In addition, formal critics are not interested in what Cleanth Brooks calls "heresy heretic". The summary and explanation of the meaning and contents of poems ignores this. It is made up of specific words and is in a unique relationship with each other, but the effect of talking about poetry in other languages ​​can not be captured. Translating the meaning of the poem we see into everyday words weakens that power and replaces the unique structure of poetry in a normal way. The meaning is inseparable from the original form. Or, as the poet X. Kennedy states, "For poetry, nothing is more interesting than just tragic prose."

</ Tab /> American formal critic of the 20th century, Cleanth Brooks; "Thinking about the psychological process of the author, critics shifted from work to biography and psychology. I decided to do research rather than creating; investigating the author's life explains the process of composition, not the structure of what constitutes it 4. In other words, the biographical information is excessive to the requirement and hinders the analysis of the content of the text.

Essay.com/ What is the historical background, can you explain or enrich the text by considering the context?

Professor Cleanth Brooks at Harvard University is one of the supporters of this critique that became popular in the middle of the 20th century and early critics such as Bradley tended to view Shakespearean characters as genuine people There. It is not a fictional literary work. New critics view poetry and theater as self-contained artworks and emphasize that writers use literary means such as symbolism, metaphor, and irony. In his essay "Nude Baby And Manly Cloak", including his criticism of "Shackles Manufactured", Brooks uses special attention to the use of Shakespeare's symbolism or the use of objects to express ideas and emotions I am paying. Brooks thinks that an important symbol in a drama is clothing. Clothes are used in various ways to indicate that Macbeth is hiding in the stolen clothes of King Duncan.

From the 1930s to the 1960s, new criticism became an American critic. This is the most powerful aspect of American literary criticism. Representatives are John Crowe Ransom, Allen Tate, Cleveland Brooks, Robert Penn Warren. "The influential criticism method developed by these poet professors emphasizes the improvement of closely reading comprehension.The new critic is thinking about the evaluation of poetry as a reason for literary scholarship." Brooks and Warren Understanding Poetry (1938) became one of the most influential college poetry textbooks in the 1930s, revised and reissued in the 1970s. (Morrison: 29)