The Failures of New Urbanism

New urbanism is the development of idle lands to create a utopian environment where all aspects of modern life can coexist in a planned, easy-to-walk environment. The philosophy of New Urbanism redefines the means to subdivide idle land in order to take full advantage of the space allocated for new development. Therefore, residential or municipal batch sizes are limited based on the determined minimum required to comfortably occupy a given width. The new urbanism philosophy focuses on the site analysis and planning process, but they ignore the creation of buildings that can be considered unique and ideal.

However, this includes changing the location of the architecture and finding productive new statements with data driven arbiterism. This is a convenient and necessary countermeasure, it is a crystallized but short-lived software architecture. These software architectures are designed to prevent 'citizen's failure' when applied to the determination of new urban services such as Uber and AirBnB, or when developing a new platform for decision making such as cloud funding services You can take advantage of architecture and urbanization aspects. But has the position of the building changed? Le Corbusier once defined the building as "a mass of light, an accurate and magnificent drama". If this is all the architecture of today, there is little to the future in the world where the majority is established - and there are basically no architects elsewhere. Bernard Rudofsky's paper "Architecture and Architecture" includes regional architecture, but many modern cities do not form architects

Even architects and even architects can not manage large buildings such as high-rise buildings, large landscapes, and even cities. When contemporary urbanism encounters architecture, big problems arise. "S, M, L, XL Rem Koolhaas, Bruce Mau, 1995, pp. 494-516," architecture acquired very large attributes beyond a certain scale ". Today, among citizen's needs, modernization, and building as architectural art, urbanism chooses what citizens need, and this is when construction begins to decline. The art and beauty of architecture is useless for urbanism. But the importance is a solution, "It's an architecture that can survive and even use it." (S, M, L, XL Rem Koolhaas, Bruce Mau, 1995, pp 494-516). As Reem said, Bigness is a solution, perhaps the only solution for urbanization and building construction. "It is not a compulsory coexistence, it's about the free system, the biggest difference."