The Exclusivity of the Art Market

Novelist Saavedra (1819) said: "Low cost is not high value." Some people may say this phenomenon is very realistic for the art market. Elitism and uniqueness promote the development of the art world. The value of a work of art is built socially and subjectively, based on an important and non-essential theoretical basis. Therefore, due to the nature and quality of these works in particular, the title of the artwork is not so important. However, in the context of contemporary art, we can not deny that capitalism and the world of art seem to supplement each other.

Applied to the consumer market, the conditions to determine strong brand demand may be transferred to the art market, especially in the 21st century. A unique art market that is available to a small number of people and is unprecedented rapidly democratizes. Consumption of art became more familiar. But it also leads to confusion. The fundamental driving force behind this development is the increase in digitalization of the art market. Artists, galleries, auction houses, especially social media are everywhere. Numerous online platforms provide a market for buying art. Internet and social media are reducing barriers to entry. It not only makes the art market more accessible to consumers but also makes it possible for anyone to position and develop themselves as artists or dealers

Here you can see the people, places and the capital city involved in the art world participating in the discussion of the nature of art through representatives of artists and works in their particular interested environment. The art market is determined by a series of luxury galleries, auction houses, exhibitions, groups, and millions of dollar art school systems. In the art show, we saw the Venice Biennale, an incredibly expensive annual art exhibition. At La Biennale, we hold a worldwide paparazzi, which is said to be one of the events of the Red Carpet, one of the world's most important artistic events. The artists exhibited at La Biennale are associated with a certain historical heritage, which is very important to the art world. In the biennale, artworks may arrive at Sotheby's big auction house, and representatives of art dealers and collectors often tell you to buy hundreds of millions of art.

Of course, the art market and the digital rare art market are separate beasts. This is the point! Rare digital art has expanded the whole art experience to people who have not been able to access before, even art and general people from creation to exhibitions, collections and trading. But I do not agree that there is no similarity between these two worlds. I am not talking about dentists here. This is art, and these are also artists. Why is Moxarra not an artist, or why his work is not an art controversy?