The Evolution of a Horse

Before 34.55 million years ago, Ma began history on North American continent. This took place in the early Middle Eastern period from the Eocene to the Tertiary. Hyracotherium or Eohippus, also known as the dawn horse, has relatively long legs compared to its body and began to adapt to running. This is a small, dog-sized forest's herbivorous animal ("Wild Horse: American Romance" 1). Since the bones are not fused, the front leg has five toes at the end of the flexible and rotatable leg.

Evolutionists have evolved from Eohippus to Equus using evolutionary examples of horses with head and leg skeletons, but the founder said "Fossils of these living things were not found in the fossil record" I found it. Indeed, the fossil record proves that these organisms exist simultaneously. (Note 5) Evolution should be a process of change. Creationist said, "If an ancient worm or other bone-free creature turns into a vertebrate with a slow backbone, there should be a series of intermediate fossil species that recorded the process of the actual change." There. Less than these intermediate fossils, in fact, they are almost 100% missing. Professor Alfred Romer at Harvard University states that the evolution from this invertebrate to a vertebrate must cost 100 million years to gain fossil evidence.

For many people, the Ma family is still a typical example of evolution. As more and more fossils are discovered, some thoughts on the evolution of horses have changed, but the Ma family is still a good example of evolution. In fact, we now have enough fossils of sufficient sort to check the subtle details of the evolutionary change, such as the pattern of speciation. Horses are constantly separated from "evolutionary trees" and develop along a variety of unrelated paths. There is no obvious "straight line" in the evolution of horses. To accommodate a variety of different diet, there are usually many horses at the same time, with different numbers of toes. In other words, the evolution of a horse has no intrinsic direction. Since there is only one genus, there is only the impression of linear evolution. This will deceive someone who thinks to some extent that this species is the "target" of all evolution.