The Ethics of Ambiguity

Ambiguity can be defined as an exact meaning or lack of interpretation. Therefore, we describe how human existence is "ambiguous". Of course, we can use some essence or trait to integrate the meaning of our existence. However, it is difficult to judge exactly what each person has in common. Celebrity and wealth's dream motivates and consumes the lives of some people, others dedicate their lives to help unfortunate people, and some people still watch television on the sofa I am sitting.

The ethics of ambiguity is fighting classical philosophical concepts such as freedom, choice, human responsibility, and meaning of life. In order to understand the importance of "vague ethics" in the big dialogue on existentialism, it is important to understand the important hypothesis of existentialism, that is, the concept of "exists before essence" - a person through their choice and behavior - It is important to understand. Let's make meaning in life. Therefore, the ethics of ambiguity provides guidance on how to choose and how to act.

"Fuzziness ethics" by French philosopher Simone De Beauvoir (1908-1986), published in 1948 after the Second World War, is a major contribution to existentialism and a practical ethical system I outline it. . Debroba believes that human freedom opposes philosophers and skeptics who say that human freedom brings moral responsibility and that existentialism does not provide practical guidelines for leading our lives. Based on the French existentialist Jean-Paul Sartre's "existence and emptiness", this paper ultimately promises to develop a moral system based on existentialist principles.

In her book "Identity Ethics" published in 1947, Simone de Beauvoir outlined the existential ethics. She was inspired by the promise made by Paul Sartre at the end of "presence and absence" (1943); he wrote many notes, but he never completed the project. Ambiguity is one of Deborah's most interesting and ingenious philosophical works. But, is the theory included therein defensible? Does it provide practical guidance on how we are living our lives? In "a country of freedom" (BF), a careful analysis of Beauvoir's morals, Kristana Alp asked, the ambiguity of Beauvoir is actually a form of moral subjectiveism. Arp tried to judge whether it would be compromised by such accusations, and studied possible real existence ethics, including freedom and values ​​in particular. Arp considers de Beauvoir 's morals to be worthwhile, but its answer is still unclear.