The Ethical and Theological Implications of Human Cloning

Ethical and Theological Significance of Human Cloning Introduction Advances in science and technology often result in revolutionary changes in perception of society in the world. When computers were invented for the first time, they were used to calculate the ballistic table; today they show the myriad functions that can not be imagined with their thoughts. Space travel changed the way people see themselves based on a larger background. In 1978, the first test tube baby was born in England. And it allowed the baby to become pregnant for the first time outside the womb of the mother.

There are many ethical problems surrounding human cloning, and there is no agreement on these ethical issues. Most ethical implications are theological concerns and different religious views that allege that human clones change what God wants and change the way the human baby is born. Many religious organizations believe that embryos must be regarded as humans and the therapeutic cloning behavior of stem cells extracted from embryos is the same as human killing. Because of this belief, many people oppose human cloning by ending their lives to make others live longer (Putatunda, 2007).

In bioethics, cloning ethics refers to various ethical positions on the practice and possibilities of cloning, especially human cloning. Many of these views are religious, but problems raised by replication also face secular views. Human treatment and reproductive cloning has not been used commercially; animals are currently cloned in laboratory and livestock production. Advocates endorse the development of therapeutic cloning to make tissues and organs as a whole, to avoid transplant otherwise, to avoid the need for immunosuppressants and to avoid the effects of aging . Advocates of reproductive cloning think that infertile parents should be able to access this technology