The mistake is that the "validity of the result proving means" is an invalid statement and those who agree with the statement clearly believe that as long as the result is good and the goal is being achieved, murder, theft, and deception are not important ing. "Rationality of means to prove measures" basically refers to the morality of actions meaning that "good results can justify mistakes that take such action".
Kant's justice points out that the right things and bad things are determined by action. Regardless of the outcome, are the actions right or wrong? The purpose is not the rationality of the means, it can not justify rationality. In situations and circumstances, you need to evaluate whether the situation itself is correct or incorrect. Whether it is correct or incorrect is wrong. Likewise, despite the negative end, the correct action is still correct. If Guantanamo prisoners are treated regardless of human rights, that treatment should be evaluated as accurate. This is a mistake, as it violates ethics and does not consider human rights. Of course, the treatment of these prisoners may provide useful information on terrorist attacks and may be useful for fighting terrorism. Of course, we can promote world peace. Of course, it will provide justice for victims of terrorism. But this is not all a problem - human rights abuses are morally wrong
In theory, most of us agree with a range of values based on the idea that human beings are purpose rather than means. It can not be treated for human beings. Even if that slavery is of great interest, it is a mistake to make a person slave. Even though we can save lots of lives, it is a mistake to kill human organs. Even if the whole family depends on it, the company has succeeded because he dismissed people. Even if you put the work of their life in your application, the school gains fame to refuse people. The leaders of the war on terror unconsciously killed people. These are the children who are the foundation of our survival and happiness.
People were killed in war, self-defense, the death penalty. All murder cases are wrong, but not all murder cases are murder cases. Because it is being killed, therefore, euthanasia is not wrong. The whole problem is whether it is reasonable to kill. Proving these things, "This particular killing is justified." Deliberate killing, self defense, protection of others, war and death penalty quoted to prove that the murder is correct In case of being executed in the context of a convicted criminal with reasonable and convincing evidence what has to be done. Otherwise, it must be treated as a murder case, it is always morally wrong