The Elusive Term

Because it does not conform to its logical meaning, the elusive term "ringer" is slippery. Once research and definition is over, it is well known that ring providers are king and prince. You can call it not only King but Ring Giver. A person in administrative position can be called a donor. This armband and award winning Tarnes proved the effectiveness of their battle and was highly appreciated by relatives. Therefore, warriors pays close attention to their rewards. As a result of the investigation, people have also discovered that the term "ringer" is a kind of Kenning, or a metaphor of Anglo-Saxon.

Culture is an elusive term that has received hundreds of definitions. The influential definition of Hofstede (1984, page 21) is that culture is "collective plan of mind separating members of one human group from another". Main aspects: force distance, avoidance of uncertainty, individualism and collectivism, manhood and femininity, long-term and short-term orientation. In the national cultural framework, long range distances can be converted into potential corruption behavior. Takyi-Asiedu (1993) associated corruption in sub-Saharan Africa with corruption. Cohen, Pant and Sharp (1996) also discovered that people with high power distance culture tend to think that unethical behavior is acceptable.

Culture is considered the most elusive term in social science, Jahoda, 1984 (), which is difficult to define. Initially, it was mainly studied by anthropologists. Tylor 1871, p. 1 () defines culture as a "complex whole" including knowledge, beliefs, arts, ethics, laws, customs, and other skills and customs that humans acquire as members of society. This definition embodies whether culture should be regarded as an intangible abstraction of norms, beliefs, values, or specific activities and behaviors (Segall, 1984). These two definition sets coexist in anthropology Kashima, 2000 ()

Did we measure what we expect to measure? Some problems in cultural measurement in consumer survey

In the earliest expressions, the term "political economics" was basically a synonym for economics, but now it is relatively obvious to refer to collective or political processes to study public economic decision-making It is a difficult term. In the field of climate change, Tanner and Allouche (2011) defines political economics as "process of conceptualization, negotiation and execution of ideas, power and resources by different groups of different sizes". Although there are many literature on political economics of environmental policy explaining that 'political failure' of environmental policy 'effectively and effectively protects the environment', the identification of climate change using the framework of political economy The systematic analysis of the problem is relatively. limited