The effects of state and Federal gun control laws on school shootings

The school shooting incident is the most eye-catching murder case in the United States. They are also the rarest killers. In 2014, there were only 17 killings of guns at schools and universities. The purpose of this study was to clarify the relationship between shooting in schools and state and federal gun control laws. Using Poisson, a bi-directional fixed effect model, we found that banning offensive weapons reduced the number of victims of shooting at school by 54.4%. All other gun control laws (hidden carryover, personal sale background check, and Federal dealer background check) have no statistically significant impact on school shooting incidents. The ban on aggressive weapons may reduce the total number of victims of shooting, but the average reduction of victims of murder may be less than 10 years. Therefore it is unknown whether gun control is the most appropriate policy to reduce the number of victims of school shooting.

He wrote: "The only gun control measures that have a statistically significant impact on the number of school shoot victims is ban on weapons of assault." "Prohibition of aggressive weapons, state or federal government enforced When done, the number of school shoot victims fell by 54.4% at the time of entry. "

Gius' 2017 survey focused on school shooting. Focusing on 1990-2014, he banned federal aggressive weapons, a federal preliminary survey to buy guns from dealers, and three state laws: the prohibition of aggressive weapons, the "hidden carry" I studied the effect. "A person will make a legal and career confirmation on the sale of firearms to another person, he wrote:" The only gun control measures that have a statistically significant impact on the number of school shoot victims We are prohibited from beating weapons. "" The ban on offensive weapons, when the state or federal government is enforced, the number of school shoot victims fell by 54.4% at the time of entry. "

After the school was dismissed, the left side cried for more stringent gun control. Enhancement of identity surveillance, closure of loopholes in gun law, prohibition of assault rifle and prohibition of automatic weapons, limitation on the number of guns that can be purchased, and extension of waiting period. In their reply, rights are equally predictable. They are not gun problems, guns do not kill people - people kill people - this is the time of prayer, school teachers should be armed, children are overly violent It should be exposed. Parents and educators join the left side, advocate more stringent gun control measures, and advocate mental health support and bullying recognition program. The problems of mental health, bullying prevention, and more stringent gun control are considered the best deterrent against future shooting at school, so they are getting the most notable, time, energy, and money. But are they the best deterrents? That's why