Architecture and building environment Architecture reflects the values and concepts of society of the times. The role of architecture in shaping society and vice versa largely depends on the duration of the problem and the nature and factors that are initially affected. The age after enlightenment and enlightenment reflects the present changes in the concept of architecture, society, and the present theory. At the same time, personal identity and understanding of society, progress and truth follow similar development paths.
The purpose and pursuit of the building has had a broad impact on social structure and phenomena, especially housing, land use and urban planning. In other words, buildings are affected by social problems such as shortage, justice, social relations, duty. Some of these arise from the spatial demands of social groups and institutions and their structured organizations to promote the function and identity of groups or institutions (Halbwachs 1938). In addition, other social requirements derive from the role of architecture to meet global social concerns and needs.
Direction of causality Because social forces mainly form social forces, it may be considered that social forces mainly form buildings or buildings. As a supporter of "Shaper", we believe that architecture provides a means of organizing society, a central proposal for modernism, and a wider financial debate. Critics argue that we can not shape society through the built environment - or we should not do it. Depending on the direction, how do we solve the theoretical relationship and the actual consequences and views of a series of social phenomena? As an example, how do you measure and solve the possibility of building against social inequality? This is a function of whether the building contributes to the social class and the social class, or reflects it. We might want to know if an architect can design to promote class equality - or unity, justice, autonomy, and other social phenomena.