The Effectiveness of Shakespeare’s Linguistic Choices in Conveying the Power Struggle Between Katherine and Petruchio

Effectiveness of Shakespeare's language selection in spreading power struggle between Catherine and Petruc This article reviews William Shakespeare's "The Taming of the Shrew". This is a script that was created in London in 1592 and published in 1623. The play was created in the James era (1420-1600). The purpose of the play is to entertain the audience. The secondary objective may be to introduce the power and role of men and women of the Jakob era to modern audiences.

The aim of this paper is to analyze the point in Shakespeare's play, "Tone notes". In the first and third scenes of the fourth act, Petruqio took Katherine to the land of his country. It is here that Petruqio transforms and Catherine follows the role of a gentle wife. Because Petruchio's strategy is very good, Catherine notices that she can not tolerate his shame. The hawk mentioned by Pretruchio in his monologue (IV.i. 201 - 225) is a symbol of Katherine. Petruchio must find a way to make her the wife he wishes. To do this, he trains her like a hawk. He denied his food and slept until he thought he was willing to do whatever he wanted. He also took away the clothes and food prizes that she wanted and then took them away. Like a bird, she relies on him to do these things, understand that it is her responsibility to love and serve him.

Shakespeare's play is very powerful as it is still in the way and unstable. We left a lot of questions: Is it a disgusting woman or is it a moral game (not doing it)? Is Petruqio abusive, or is it the same as a savvy person of Katherine? Is this a couple a good game? If so, the submission process is a temptation game. In fact, is Kate really calm? Has she participated in everything that happened to her? Is she just laughing at Petruchio? Or is she part of this game, is she playing with him? How much fun is getting used to? Is this also a drama about domestication? How can I give Katherine the opportunity to retain her remarks in the last monologue if the uncontrollable woman at that time is usually punished by repressive speech? Did she make him humiliate with the last monologue? Does Shakespeare ridicule the absurdity of a married man?