The Effect of Social Loafing on Participants in Collective and Coactive Conditions

Social wandering is an important concept that can be identified in our daily life, even at school work, housework, employment, even sports. In the current study, we examine the influence of social wandering on collective and general conditions, through experiments that let participants complete brainstorming work and encourage as many methods as possible to use pencils It is. The results show that social wandering is not important under collective and general circumstances.

(Social wandering or Ratan's "social illness" is discovered.) As far as work is concerned, when people work together as a group, personal production will be reduced, but social wandering is all the situation Participants believe that social wandering will reduce or eliminate social wandering Their personal contributions are either identifiable or only necessary to make the group successful Trend of reasonable or impulsive decision - C - "Group prejudice" refers to an individual that begins after a group discussion, starts with a similar perspective, and ends in a more extreme position.

Social wandering tends to reduce individual effort when working in a group rather than working on individuals. Social influence theory takes into account the extent to which an individual is considered a source or a target of social impact. When individuals work collectively, the needs of external causes of social influences (such as experimenters and superiors) are distributed among multiple goals (ie, expansion of responsibilities among all group members), the results The effort is reduced as. In personal work, this proliferation did not occur, and individuals worked hard because there was no spread of responsibility. The division of social influence is considered to be a function of existence, immediacy, the number of sources and targets, and it shows that as the size of the group increases, the influence of each additional group member decreases It is.