Students learn and work in various ways. For example, some people like to practice flash cards, others prefer to create pulmonary devices. A general learning aid is to listen to music. People think that concerts will have a major impact on the learning process, but it is still a common learning method. In fact, concerts are widely believed to add focus and eliminate distracting background sounds. However, the influence of music on memory is not taken into consideration, it is not attention and concentration.
This research aims to explore sound-independent sound effects. The main objective is to study how different types of BGM affect continuous recall performance and produce irrelevant sound effects. Two musical attributes, vocal music and rhythm are studied according to the meaning of speech cycle and change state hypothesis. By examining the musical attributes included in this study, we tried to determine the characteristics of background music and to determine its deleterious effects on continuous recall performance.
It may be said that people expected that BGM's long-term habits weakened the negative impact on the performance of continuous recall. However, the results of the three lines of research presented in this study suggest that at least in the context of background music, irrelevant sound effects are not mitigated by long-term exposure or habits. The first evidence is that even if you are accustomed to BGM, you notice that overall performance is not affected. Participants familiar with these songs are influenced by BGM like music strangers. Secondly, there is no evidence of unrelated music habits during exams and blocks. Finally, through customary explanations, participants who are accustomed to learning with music may be skilled by coordinating their music and may therefore have continuous recall performance .
First, in this survey, each participant used an internal design that performs 6 consecutive recalls. There is concern that the effect of this exercise may be confused with the impact of BGM on recall performance, as evidenced by the increase in the number of trials of practice, the performance of regular recall has improved (Dallett, 1963) . However, as statistical analysis shows that there is no significant practical effect between tests or between test blocks, focusing on practical results seems to be unfounded. Nonetheless, in order to prevent fatigue related performance degradation, you can rest regularly in future research.