The Effect of Law Changes on the Growth of Divorce Rate

Impact of law amendment on growth of divorce rate Divorce is the end of statutory marriage. There is no doubt that divorce is more common and almost normal. If the current trend continues, it is estimated that one third of marriages end in divorce, which is a change in legal reasons that led to this trend. In this article I will look at other aspects that may be the basis of divorce and national development. I think that is the most important factor.

The divorce rate is rising steadily. Following the first major change in the 1968 divorce law, there was a sharp increase (from 54.8 divorces per 100 thousand people in 1968 to 124.2 in 1969). Since then, this growth continued to accelerate with the revision of the divorce law, reaching the second peak in the late 1980s. At the beginning of the 21st century, the lowest divorce risk was the first year of marriage, but the risk slowly declined after the risk increased and peaked in the following four years. A considerable number of couples divorce in due course and most divorced couples get married under the age of 15

Between 1969 and 1985, each state relaxed the divorce law. This change was almost completed in 1979, when only two states sought evidence of negligence before seeking divorce. As shown in Figure 1, the divorce rate nearly doubled during this period. This is not surprising as divorce in a faultless law reduces divorce costs and spouses' incentive for spouse's investment marriage weakens. However, the assertion that the no-fault divorce law brought about a long-term rise in divorce rate has been disputed. Elizabeth Peters, Coase negotiations, divorce level is

Our research on divorce rates from 1988 to 1991 provides the strongest evidence to date up to the present that no-fault divorce law is associated with a higher-level divorce. Since previous studies have defined "no fault" based solely on the dissolution of marriage and ignore the economic penalties that the court may impose on the wrong party, serious non-fault of the long-term divorce rate I failed to find a predictor. . Therefore, they believe that there is no fault in the implementation of economic penalties against negligence in some countries. This is a mistake because fewer errors are punished and the number of divorce decreases. This explains why our NO - FAULT coefficient correlates positively significantly with the high divorce rate in Table 4, but it is the reason why less accurate and undisturbed predictors are not necessarily significant .