"Today, what is accepted as knowledge may be abandoned tomorrow." Consider the problem of knowledge raised by this statement with knowledge of the two fields. Knowledge can be defined as a reasonable and true belief. It is also a subjective belief that depends on personal viewpoint, cultural background, and education system. It points out that some of our beliefs remain the same even over time as the assertions of knowledge acquired today are not necessarily destroyed tomorrow. That's right.
One way to do this is to review the current education system - knowledge is distilled from aggressive educators to more than 30 students passively absorbing knowledge. This is a traditional "free size" process (communication of knowledge is done between educators and X students) and the main function of the student is to absorb information conveyed from the teacher. In our traditional classroom, the most active part of the learning phase is not a student but a teacher. She spends a lot of energy preparing the content, reading various documents and texts, and guessing for yourself and 30 for help. Organize the material in an individual (one person decides the best for the other thirties - what I have missed here?) And in a coherent and coherent way, and finally she tells I handed it to 30 students.
Why do we need to change existing education system? The current traditional educational system is based on the era of industrial revolution. In the era of the industrial revolution, people need to learn the knowledge applicable to the skills necessary for the work created at that time. As there are flaws in the current legacy system, we need to make a new system update for our educational system. Let's look at some of the pitfalls of traditional systems. It is assumed that some students are smarter than others and that many people can change it. Even if official tracking is canceled, most schools offer a variety of courses based on performance level. Therefore, the traditional education system focuses on ranking and classifying the students to determine who can go on to college.
The business model of Education Bank is the term Paulo Freire uses to describe and critique the traditional education system. This name refers to the metaphor of the student as a container, and the educator must add knowledge to it. Freire considers this model to strengthen the critical thinking of students and lack of intellectual property rights, thus strengthening oppression, and understanding Freire's knowledge is the result of human creation. Paul Freire used the bank education model for the first time in his powerful book "Pedagogy of oppression". Education is expressed as "fundamentally narrative (sexual) personality": 57 are teacher-centric (ie active participants) and students are considered passive