The Dynamics of Faith

The dynamics of belief in the dynamics of faith is a thorough study of what is the belief from a theological point of view. Tillich has answered all writers he has read so far and seems to put their arguments in the context of faith. This is evident in his argument about the community than page 24. He correctly admits that beliefs usually appear in their social environment. Then he continues to clarify the different assertions that we need it as a language is necessary for expressing it that the community is necessary to see the performance of faith.

Protestant theologian Paul Tillich touched a similar theme in his landmark work Dynamics of Face. In this section, he wrote "faith of truth" about the scientific truth. When he said, "There is no contradiction between the true nature of faith and the essence of reason," he immediately clarified his view as "the truth of science and the truth of faith does not belong to the same dimension" . Faith does not have the power to hinder science. One aspect of the meaning is that it can not interfere with other dimensions. "Since Tillich defines faith as the ultimate concern, he does not see how scientific evidence confirmed or denied the ultimate concern to God for man.

In the dynamics of the relationship between faith and reason, it is clear that any philosophy that reasons the existence of God - a reasonable argument itself does not lead to faith in God. It only allows me to believe that the subject believes his revelation is justified in history and accept the gift of faith. The natural knowledge of God - a reasonable analysis philosophy makes it possible for subjects to recognize the meaning of individual responsibility for the truth and the meaning of the humble way of mystery of existence. But only the apocalypse reveals that the true meaning of this responsibility for the truth is in the selection of one person, the recognition of the call, and the invitation of life. If you ask the Catholic Church's document if you need to understand the natural knowledge of God to understand what the Bible's revelation tells to God, the answer is yes.

If no other elements are provided, the initial analysis of dynamics between faith and reasoning about the natural knowledge of God leads to a conclusion that beliefs may not exert a specific influence on this knowledge. However, this conclusion has been practiced irrespective of the concept of revelation, to some extent understanding of the term "belief", that is to say in response to historical classification, and to the specific concept of the term "rational" It is understood as. Philosophical rationality This understanding is acceptable, but in particular you need to mention beforehand if you want to interpret Magisterial's files or texts written by other authors. On the contrary, if we accept the view that the autonomy of human reason is not absolute and that God's revelation in history includes God's revelation in creation, it is possible to think of the relationship between faith and reason in natural knowledge is. It is dynamic. God