The Dissertation Committee for Bryan Edward Stone certifies that this is the approved version of the following dissertation:

Mary E. Clater's paper was judged and approved *: Charles D. Kupfer, Associate Professor, American Research History John R. Haddad Associate Professor of American Studies and Popular Culture Harold B. Shill Professor of Political Science Anne A. Verplanck USA Research Associate Professor And Heritage Study Associate Professor David S. Witwer Associate Professor, American Studies and History Simon J. Bronner Emeritus Professor, American Research and Folklore, PhD Program, American Research * Signature Archive Graduate School

This paper was created under the guidance of the candidate's paper committee, approved by members of the committee, proposed and approved by the Faculty of Education, and partially fulfills the requirements of the PhD in education. The content and research method presented in this work represents only the work of the candidate.

Everyone who defends and defends the paper knows that the best paper is the completed paper. My paper was completed with an e-mail confirming that the committee approved, signed by all of the committee, submitted to the graduate school, graduate school approval, and doctoral course was satisfied. Defense of a paper is a completely unique experience, but I think the best way to experience the paper defense presentation is to fast forward (not in real time). So I put a defense presentation in the video and scrolled 100 slides in two 45 minutes. So after I played the game, in a couple of years I sat down to see the flight work in less than three minutes.